RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Twitter’

10 online tools I’ve found useful in 2010

21 Dec

Other stuff I’m still using from last year includes wordpress.org, the KING of blogging platforms! And Slideshare of course, I’m using that more and more. Photofunia I still occasionally use if I want to put a photo into some kind of interesting context with the minimum of fuss. Flickr creative commons for images. iGoogle is still the starting point for my web use – I find being able to log into any PC in the world and find the same home-page, with all my bookmarks etc, very helpful. Pbworks wikis are ace – you can set one up for anything, even if it’s just to have your own ‘in the cloud’ storage space. And finally Twitter – it’s just over a year since my first ever Tweet, and it’s arguably the single most valuable tool I use, I think. It’s great for a million and one reasons – if you’re an Information Professional not currently on there, I too used to be a big skeptic but trust me, it’s worth it.

This is the final pre-Christmas blog post, so, have a good one! :)

- thewikiman

{lang: 'en-GB'}
 

New to Twitter? Here’s what you do

24 Sep

[If you're not already on Twitter, just give up and join. It's really worth it, and it's really NOT like it is often reported to be in the mainstream media. There's a big myth that twitter is just people saying 'this is what I had for lunch today' - it's not like that at all. Celebrities understandably get the bulk of the coverage when Twitter gets into the news - you have to understand that someone like Stephen Fry (or whoever) is followed by literally 1.8 million people; he can't possibly interact with all of them, so his twitter stream reads more like a monologue than a dialogue. But you (almost certainly) won't have that many followers, meaning you'll be able to use Twitter for the purpose for which it is intended: conversation. It's full of useful links, it can lead to all sorts of opportunities, it breaks the ice at conferences, and it adds colour to professional relationships.]

A twitter bird holding a 'follow me' sign

Here 10 top tips I wish I’d known about Twitter from the start.

  • Put in a bio. You need a bio, don’t leave it blank or just put in a town or your job title. Twitter works because it facilitates conversation – to converse with people generally you need to follow each other. What happens when someone new follows you is you get an email – so and so is now following you on twitter, here’s some more information about them. Most people will click on this and read about this new follower, and perhaps check a few recent tweets before deciding whether to follow or not – it’s a tough crowd, generally, because popular tweeters get so many followers that you have to stand out for them to take an interest in you; no one wants information overload. If you don’t say who you are or give people anything to go on in your bio, chances are they won’t follow you back, thus reducing the chances of the two of you conversing, thus reducing the value you’re getting out of using Twitter. I don’t believe in amassing followers for the sake of it, but of the 40 or so people who I follow but don’t follow me back, four or five of them I wish would do so (I’m looking at you, Helene Blowers…). If that figure was really high, Twitter wouldn’t be working so well for me. For an example of a good bio, check out Buffy Hamilton’s twitter profile – fantastic! No wonder she has that many followers.
  • Use a headshot of yourself. Twitter is a more personal medium than a blog – I started off using the wikiman logo, but changed it because people want to contextualise what you’re saying with a picture of your actual face. Even if you’re shy, try and go with some kind of picture of yourself if you can…
  • Cannibalise the follow lists of people you like. So for example, if you are an Information Professional, you’ll probably know of a few people on Twitter than you can start following right away. But also look at the people they follow and start following the most interesting looking of them, and then do the same again, and so on, till you’ve got a decent sized group of interesting people. (If you’re an information professional, feel free to cannibalise mine – everyone I follow is awesome…)
  • Don’t just follow the Queen Bee, follow the workers too. Many, many tweets are @ replies. This means they begin with @[Insert Person's Twitter name here] and are consequently only seen by people following both the tweeter and the person they are tweeting at. So you could miss fantastic conversations if you’re only following one of the parties – they simply won’t appear in your twitter stream. (64% of my tweets are @replies, according to TweetStats, meaning that the vast majority of my output is only seen by some of my followers.) Therefore, if you really like someone on Twitter, follow the people they interact with too, so you increase your chances of serendipitous interesting conversation overhearing. :)
  • Give of yourself, from the start. If Twitter ends up working for you, you’ll end up being yourself. You’ll end up sharing more than just work stuff, probably, and being closer to your true personality than you might imagine – more unguarded. You have to make up your own mind if you’re happy to be unguarded online, and how unguarded you are going to be. But the point is, don’t be shy and don’t try and hide your personality – people want personality, they’ll forgive quirks if they get more character from you (and therefore more value), and as I say if you’re here for the long haul it’ll happen eventually anyway. Just be yourself from the start.
  • Tweet links to your stuff. / Tweet links to other people’s stuff. Twitter provides a large percentage of hits on this blog. If you blog with wordpress, use a plug-in like Twitoaster to auto-tweet links to your blog posts, and draw the twitter conversation into the comments section of your blog. But don’t, whatever you do, just use Twitter to self-promote. People will suss you out and switch off pretty quickly. People will be interested in what you have to say if you tweet links to a broad range of useful, pertinent stuff.
  • ReTweet. Don’t assume everyone else will have seen what you’ve seen. If something’s really worth reading, ReTweet it so that your followers can all read it – they may not follow the person who originally said it, or they may not have been online when it was said. Plug people in to the good content. What you want to achieve overall is a blend of useful information, thoughts, links, character and responses to other tweets. Don’t be afraid to jump into conversations, either – certain people I follwed for ages without them reciprocating, but as soon as I @ replied to one of their tweets they started following me too because I demonstrated some value to them; we’ve since gone on to chat all the time.
  • Don’t ever criticise your employer. Twitter is personal  – but don’t forget that unless you lock down your account, anyone can read it. There’s nothing to be gained from venting your frustration at your institution via this medium – just resist the temptation! You never know who may end up reading it. Or who may end up not seeking you out to give you an opportunity later. Generally speaking, unless you are going to tweet anonymously, discretion is the better part of valour when it comes to criticism of all kinds – by all means give an opinion, but always run this test before you tweet something harsh about an individual: would I say this to their face?
  • Investigate clients . I must admit, I’ve found Twitter’s homepage adequate for my needs. But many people use clients, that access Twitter but present the information in a better or different way – try Brizzly, or Tweetdeck (and you can sync those with Twitter on your phone, too).
  • Prune. Don’t just follow everyone. Followers are not an end in themselves – don’t just automatically follow everyone back because they’ve followed you. If you are to use Twitter at all it needs to WORK for you – you need to follow a manageable amount of people, or at the very least use lists to sort the essentials from the occasionally interestings. About once a month, go through the list of people you follow, and if any of them are no longer giving you value, unfollow them. It may seem brutal, but you really don’t want to end up viewing Twitter as a chore because there’s so much irrelevant stuff in your stream.

For more info on the nuts and bolts of it, check out Twitter’s official guide.

Happy tweeting!

- thewikiman

UPDATE: since writing this, I’ve come across a lot of people ReTweeting a link as part of a reply to a person. So for example I might tweet “Check out this presentation [URL here]” and someone else wants to ReTweet it but does so like this: “@theREALwikiman really useful presentation [URL here]“. If you reply to someone then the only people who can read the tweet are people who follow you AND the person you are replying to – in other words, no one new will see the Tweet. So – don’t do that. Does that make sense?

That’s the explanation; the rule is, if you want to draw people’s attention to something, make sure there is something – literally ANY character except @ – before you include the name of the person who originally tweeted. So in the example above, the tweet should read “really useful presentation via @theREALwikiman [URL here].” That way, everyone who follows you will get the message. Got it? Good!

================================================================================

If you found this post useful, check out previous guides to:

================================================================================

{lang: 'en-GB'}
 

NPID2010: New Professionals Information Days

22 Sep
Newcastle City Library, via Flickr CC (ricaird)

Shiny, no? One of the venues for NPID2010

For the last few months I’ve been working with Chris Rhodes, Maria Cotera and Kathy Ennis to create a new CILIP event. Actually it’s a refit of an old one – the CILIP Graduate Day that I presented at last year. We’ve re-thought it from scratch, introduced some new ideas, got in some fantastic speakers, and rebranded it as New Professionals Information Days - the reason that is ‘Days’ plural is that we’re doing the programme twice, once in London and once in Newcastle, to try and make CILIP more inclusive and a little less London-centric.

Some of the ideas we’ve incorporated came from the many people (most of them New Professionals Support Officers) who took part in the initial brain-storming session at CILIP HQ. Our little working group then took these ideas on and honed them into what I think will be a truly excellent pair of events.

The London event takes place at CILIP on October 1st, and the Newcastle event takes place at the City Library on November the 23rd. You can find full information, including times, speakers, topics, how to book and so on, via CILIP’s website. For now, here’s a few points I’d like to highlight:

  • The events are free (and you get refreshments too!). I’d be really surprised if you get to another event this year, with such a good line-up of interesting speakers and topics, without having to hand over a big chunk of change
  • They are aimed at people who’ve joined the profession in the last few years, and also those who haven’t joined it yet at all
  • The days are structured in such a way that many people will be able to attend without having to take a full day off work – so for example, the London event runs from half-nine in the morning till four in the afternoon, but the last session is a repeat of the first session (with the keynote speakers sandwiched in between). So you only actually need to come from 9:30 till 1pm to see everything – OR, if you prefer, from 12 till 4pm. Good eh? I think this is a mint idea (got a feeling it came from Bethan Ruddock in the original brain storming session) and more conferences should make themselves flexible in this way
  • The theme is great – pursue your passion through librarianship. This is something I’ve written about before – how the information profession allows you to pursue your existing passions and bring them into your job; I’m thrilled we’ve managed to build the entire conference around this idea. We need to publicise this aspect of librarianship more, it’s ace.
  • The speakers are fantastic! First we put together a list of the subjects we’d like to hear about as New Professionals, and divided them into different strands. Then we put together a wish-list of who we’d ideally like to hear speak on the subjects we’d come up with. And basically they all said yes! One person couldn’t make it so I’m having to fill in with a talk about technology (and the Prezi I’m going to use for that will be lovely :) ) but otherwise we’ve got a stellar line up – including Phil Bradley, whose keynote will be entitled “Around the world twice on a library degree”! How cool does that sound? I’ve never got to see Phil talk in the flesh before, and we’re honoured to have him.
  • Newcastle City Library is beautiful… It’s a fantastic modern building – if you live Up North, try and come along just to see how a brand new library operates, looks, and feels. You can always nip in from 15:45 – 16:45 and just hear Phil and Maxine Miller‘s keynotes!
  • If you can’t attend, you can follow on twitter using the hashtag #NPID2010, and either way you can get to know the speakers a little bit better: @PhilBradley, @katie_fraser, @LexRigby, me(!), and, coming over all the way from Spain, @nrobinsongarcia. We’ll also be doing something with Wallwisher that will allow in-the-flesh attendees and virtual-attendees to interact together. WOOF!

So a free event, organised flexibly to fit your schedule, great networking opportunities, in ace surroundings, with online elements, and brilliant speakers. How can you resist? London is nearly full already by the way, so book soon if you want to go.

Really excitingly for me, the London event is being followed by a LISNPN meet-up that evening, in a pub of Woodsiegirl’s choosing. The idea is to come together, set the world to rights, and plan a fool proof future for the profession… There’s one in Manchester soon too (tomorrow at the time of writing), and both have been organised spontaneously by the members of the network. This excites me more than anything we’ve done with LISNPN so far – if it provides a platform for Information Professionals actually coming together and shaping their future collectively, then it’s worth its weight in gold.

-thewikiman

{lang: 'en-GB'}
 

This isn’t just a library, it’s an M&S library…

30 Aug

So they want to put libraries in supermarkets, eh? Well that could work – depends on the supermarket. Iceland – maybe not. Kerry Katona eating snack-sized party favourites whilst dead-eyededly telling Jason Donavon about how she saved 33% on her access to SWETS resources, equals bad.

But Marks & Spencer, on the other hand…

With deliciously free Wifi access, and an achingly gooey selection of online resources wrapped up in gorgeous single sign-in, presented on a bed of modern, bright interior with brightly coloured children’s areas, filled choc-full of tender, flavoursome books, CDs and DVDs and more…

Etc etc.

Anyway, I’m behind. I only get online for short periods of time at the moment. But today I’ve had an hour or so to catch up with the latest headline grabbing library statistics, which equate to a drop in public library use in this country. I’ve got a big old blog post on statistics planned when I get more of an opportunity – in the mean time though, Ian Clark’s piece is essential reading for everyone – read it now! :) The part of it that is really interesting is statistics from CIPFA show that while library footfall is indeed down, the numbers of web visits is up (from 07/08 to 08/09) by a massive 49%. A hypothesis immediately presents itself – the way people use libraries is changing, they don’t have to visit them so often due to the accessibility that comes with internet access (not least because they can renew book loans online – that alone accounts for a huge amount of library visits no longer necessary), so although visits to the building are down, the use of the library per se is not.

Sadly, the Government – or, to be more specific, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport – have NOT chosen to take into account internet access in the report which forms the basis for the recent headlines. Take a look at the report for yourself – you can download the spreadsheets detailing the figures, as well as the actual Word document with all the analysis, here. It’s 2010, yet the report only looks at library use from the point of view of whether its subject, to quote it directly, ‘Has visited a public library in the last year’.

[snarky aside] Guess how I accessed this report? Online. So does that mean that, according to this report’s way of analysing ‘use’, I haven’t read it at all because I didn’t go to Westminster in person and pick up a paper copy?

Buffoons. [/snarky aside]

Anyway, the figures are quite interesting – mainly fairly miserable reading, but the clouds part to let some light through on occasion:

  • Black and ethnic minority use of libraries is up since last year (it’s only by less than half a percent, but hey, no one reads the details of these things anyway, right?)
  • People who are religious but who don’t classify themselves as Christian’s use of libraries is up since last year (same again with it being by only a tiny amount, but still)
  • 11-15 year old girls use the library quite a bit more than they did in 2006/07 when the figures were first collected
  • The number of 5 to 10 year olds (of both sexes) who have visited the library ‘in the last we’ek has gone up by more than 20% over last year…

HA! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, doom-mongers! On a serious note, I think that’s encouraging – good to see that even during a down-turn in overall visitation, some minority groups are finding more reasons to visit than before. Incidentally, the report says, more than once, “The decrease in library visits is consistent across all socio-demographic groups.” Maybe I’m missing something, but that seems quite a sweeping statement in light of the stats above. If the report itself glosses over any positives, what hope is there of the headlines picking up on anything other than the negatives? In the same Ian Clark blog post I linked to above, he makes another point I think is interesting, true, and very important: “…the narrative is not being controlled by the profession but by those who either do not understand the service or are trying to undermine it for their own ends.” In this case, the Government itself is undermining the service with a report whose own headline conclusions are apparently determined to see only the negative even where the figures can be seen positively – it doesn’t take much of a cynic to interpret this as a classic Tory ‘softening up’ before they unleash massive cuts. Happy days. How can we take back control of the narrative?

Interestingly, the sample size used to generate the recent, poor figures, are much, much lower than the sample size of the earlier ones. Does that mean the figures are wrong? Probably not, but they are certainly slightly less valid than the original ones – asking 6,000 people about their library use does not represent England nearly as well as asking nearer 30,000. Some of the regions surveyed are only represented by a couple of hundred respondents. Anyway.

Libraries in pubs and supermarkets? Yeah, why not.

Among the proposals the Government are considering is sticking libraries into pubs and supermarkets apparently. This has perhaps understandably met with some derision from the library community. But actually, I think this idea is considering.

Providing the pub and shop branches didn’t replace actual purpose-built libraries, why not take our resources to where the people are already? After all, that’s why social media works so well – that’s why we all love Twitter. Because we’re on Twitter anyway, so the news, views, links etc come to us. So why not follow a similar principle with libraries? Clearly the part of libraries that would easily transport to other venues is mainly going to be the traditional ‘borrow a book’ part – but that’s okay, it will get people interested, and maybe, just maybe, they’ll be tempted to visit the library proper and see what else we have to offer.

Maybe there’ll even be a Halo Effect! (See the comments section of this previous blog post.) So to use the example in that link, the National Archive digitise collections, and then withdraw them from circulation in order to preserve them. They do this on an epic scale; more and more gets digitised every day. The statistical upshot of this is fascinating – physical consultation of the actual collections they digitise goes down (in most cases to near zero), but physical consultation overall goes up. People are finding what they want online, and they get so hooked and interested that they end up requesting other stuff which hasn’t been digitised, so they have to go to TNA to see it in the paper. Digital use and paper use are both way up, together.

Perhaps it is worth, then, trying to embrace the idea of libraries in different places and ensure it’s done well so we can reap any benefits, rather than just assuming it’s a completely hopeless idea…

- thewikiman

{lang: 'en-GB'}